Reinforcement Learning

Experiential Reinforcement Learning

TTaiwei ShiSSihao ChenBBowen JiangLLinxin SongLLongqi YangJJieyu Zhao
Published
February 15, 2026
Authors
6
Word Count
10,396
Code
Includes code

Language models learn better by reflecting on failures before retrying, like humans do.

Abstract

Reinforcement learning has become the central approach for language models (LMs) to learn from environmental reward or feedback. In practice, the environmental feedback is usually sparse and delayed. Learning from such signals is challenging, as LMs must implicitly infer how observed failures should translate into behavioral changes for future iterations. We introduce Experiential Reinforcement Learning (ERL), a training paradigm that embeds an explicit experience-reflection-consolidation loop into the reinforcement learning process. Given a task, the model generates an initial attempt, receives environmental feedback, and produces a reflection that guides a refined second attempt, whose success is reinforced and internalized into the base policy. This process converts feedback into structured behavioral revision, improving exploration and stabilizing optimization while preserving gains at deployment without additional inference cost. Across sparse-reward control environments and agentic reasoning benchmarks, ERL consistently improves learning efficiency and final performance over strong reinforcement learning baselines, achieving gains of up to +81% in complex multi-step environments and up to +11% in tool-using reasoning tasks. These results suggest that integrating explicit self-reflection into policy training provides a practical mechanism for transforming feedback into durable behavioral improvement.

Key Takeaways

  • 1

    Experiential Reinforcement Learning adds reflection and self-critique cycles to standard RL training loops.

  • 2

    Cross-episode reflection memory allows language models to accumulate and reuse successful correction strategies over time.

  • 3

    ERL mimics human learning by pausing to reflect before attempting tasks again, improving sample efficiency.

Limitations

  • Standard RLVR approaches suffer from sparse rewards and sample inefficiency in delayed feedback environments.

  • Current RL training doesn't leverage the human learning cycle of reflection, conceptualization, and experimentation.

Keywords

reinforcement learningenvironmental feedbackpolicy trainingself-reflectionbehavioral revisionexplorationoptimization

More in Reinforcement Learning

View all
Experiential Reinforcement Learning | Paperchime